Consumers Push for Consolidation in Stanley Cups Lead Litigation

Consumers suing Pacific Market International (PMI), the manufacturer of Stanley Quencher tumblers, have taken a significant step by requesting the consolidation of cases in a Washington state federal court. This move, aimed at streamlining the legal process, follows allegations that PMI neglected to reveal the presence of lead in these drinkware products.

According to Reuters, plaintiffs' lawyers have petitioned U.S. District Judge Tana Lin, suggesting that the Seattle court, coinciding with PMI’s headquarters, oversee the combined cases. They argue for consolidation to maintain uniformity in legal decisions regarding discovery and other preliminary issues in the lawsuits. 

These suits collectively accuse PMI of promoting the Stanley Quencher tumblers as a lifestyle product without adequate disclosure of the lead component..

Lead content triggers consumer backlash

As first detailed by Injury Claims in February, the Stanley class action suits argue that consumers were deceived by PMI’s marketing. Buyers allege they were kept in the dark about the lead, affecting their purchasing decisions for a product that reaches up to $50 in price. 

The main gripe lies in the supposed health risks and lack of transparency surrounding the lead in Stanley Quencher cups, with PMI allegedly targeting women with their vigorous marketing campaigns.

Responding to the outcry

In reaction to the lawsuits, Stanley has admitted to the use of lead in the sealing process of the tumblers' vacuum insulation on their website. However, they assert that this lead is not in direct contact with the user or the liquid inside. 

Nevertheless, the litigation against Pacific Market has expanded, featuring at least five similar lawsuits, each echoing the grievances regarding undisclosed lead usage. Court documents reveal that three of these legal actions originated in Seattle’s federal court, with another anticipated to join them. Meanwhile, a fifth case is underway in North Carolina’s federal court. 

These proposed class actions aim to represent any U.S. consumer who bought Stanley cups. While direct harm from lead is not claimed, the plaintiffs contend that PMI was aware of the lead issue yet chose not to inform customers.