Figma Faces Class Action Investigation Over Alleged Unauthorized AI Training on User Data

Case Overview: A class action lawsuit investigation alleges Figma used account data and user-created content to train its artificial intelligence systems without adequate consent.

Consumers Affected: Figma users whose account data or content may have been used for AI training purposes

Court: Not yet confirmed

Figma Faces Class Action Investigation Over Alleged Unauthorized AI Training on User Data

A class action investigation alleges Figma used user designs and account data to train AI without consent. Find out if you may be affected.

Figma Faces Class Action Investigation Over Alleged Unauthorized AI Training on User Data

A class action lawsuit investigation is underway alleging that Figma, the popular collaborative design platform, used account data and user-created content to train its artificial intelligence systems without obtaining meaningful consent from users. According to a recent investigation reported by Top Class Actions, attorneys are actively seeking affected users who may have had their designs, files, or account information used in AI development without their knowledge.

What the Investigation Alleges

The investigation centers on claims that Figma collected and used data generated by its users — including design assets, project files, and account information — to develop and refine its AI-powered features. The investigation alleges that users were not given clear, informed notice that their creative work and personal data could be fed into AI training pipelines.

According to the investigation, users who created content within the Figma platform may have had that content used in ways that went beyond the platform's stated purpose, and potentially beyond what users reasonably agreed to when they accepted the platform's terms of service.

What Products and Features Are at Issue

Figma is widely used by product designers, UX professionals, developers, and creative teams worldwide. The platform has in recent years expanded its feature set to include AI-assisted design tools, including capabilities that suggest layouts, generate design elements, and automate aspects of the creative workflow.

The investigation focuses on whether the underlying training data used to power those AI features was sourced from existing user content on the platform — and whether users were ever meaningfully informed that their work could serve that purpose.

Why Users May Be Concerned

Privacy advocates and legal experts have increasingly scrutinized how technology platforms handle user-generated content in the context of AI development. When users create files, designs, or other digital assets on a platform, there is often an assumption that those assets remain private or are used solely to deliver the service they signed up for.

The investigation suggests that using that content for AI training — particularly without explicit opt-in consent — may constitute a violation of users' privacy rights and potentially breach the terms users agreed to when creating their accounts.

Users who worked with sensitive client materials, proprietary designs, or confidential business assets within Figma may have particular reason to monitor this investigation closely.

Figma's Position

As of publication, Figma has not issued a public statement specifically addressing the allegations raised in this investigation. The company has not been found liable for any wrongdoing, and no court has ruled on the merits of any claims at this stage. InjuryClaims.com will update this article if the company responds.

A Growing Wave of AI Data Litigation

This investigation is part of a broader wave of legal scrutiny directed at technology companies over their AI training practices. Lawsuits and investigations involving platforms across social media, creative software, and cloud services have raised similar questions about whether companies have the right to use user-generated content to develop commercial AI products — and under what conditions.

Regulators in the United States and abroad have signaled increasing interest in establishing clearer rules around AI training data, informed consent, and digital privacy. Several state-level privacy laws may also be relevant depending on where affected users are located.

Related Cases

  • Adobe Faces Lawsuit Over AI Training Data Practices
  • OpenAI Class Action Alleges Unauthorized Use of Personal Data
  • Meta Sued Over Use of User Content for AI Development

Lawsuit: Under investigation — formal filing details not yet confirmed

Case Number: Not yet available

Court: Not yet confirmed

Plaintiffs' Attorney(s): Not yet publicly identified


Have you used Figma to create designs, projects, or other digital content? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Latest News

Loading...

Illustration of a mobile device getting an email notification