AmeriSave Mortgage Accused of Making Unwanted Sales Calls to Do Not Call Numbers

Case Overview: The lawsuit claims AmeriSave Mortgage made unsolicited sales calls to consumers on the National Do Not Call Registry.

Consumers Affected: Individuals who received AmeriSave marketing calls despite being on the Do Not Call list.

Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

AmeriSave Mortgage Corporation has been accused of making unwanted sales calls to consumers registered on the National Do Not Call Registry. 

A newly filed lawsuit claims the company ignored federal and state restrictions designed to protect people from intrusive telemarketing, using aggressive outreach methods to promote its mortgage services.

Filed by Georgia resident Erin Wilson, the case alleges AmeriSave placed multiple calls to her phone number in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and Georgia’s Telephone Solicitations Act (GTSA). 

Both laws restrict companies from contacting consumers who have opted out of telemarketing and allow financial penalties for each violation.

Lawsuit Says AmeriSave Contacted Consumers on the Do Not Call Registry

According to the lawsuit, Wilson received at least two unsolicited telemarketing calls from AmeriSave in October 2025. During one of the calls, she spoke with a representative who offered a “personalized quote” for mortgage refinancing. 

The filing says she never requested such information and immediately informed the agent that they had the wrong number and should remove her from their list.

Wilson claims the company continued contacting consumers despite knowing that many of the numbers it dialed were protected under the National Do Not Call Registry. The complaint argues that these actions violated federal and state privacy protections and subjected individuals to unwanted marketing pitches.

“Plaintiff brings this case to enforce consumer-privacy provisions that prohibit companies from making telemarketing calls to numbers on the National Do Not Call Registry,” the complaint states.

Company Accused of Ignoring Telemarketing Compliance Requirements

The TCPA was enacted to curb intrusive phone solicitations and regulate the use of automated dialing systems, prerecorded messages, and telemarketing calls. It allows consumers to recover up to $1,500 per unlawful call if a company is found to have knowingly or willfully violated the statute.

Wilson’s lawsuit also cites Georgia’s Telephone Solicitations Act, which imposes similar restrictions within the state and provides additional remedies for residents targeted by unsolicited calls. 

Together, the laws are designed to deter companies from using aggressive marketing tactics that invade consumer privacy.

Consumers Report Annoying and Harassing Calls

The lawsuit claims AmeriSave’s telemarketing practices caused harm by invading consumers’ privacy and creating a nuisance. Recipients of the calls were allegedly subjected to repeated interruptions, unwanted conversations, and disturbances in their daily lives.

“Plaintiff and all members of the proposed class have been harmed by the defendant’s conduct because their privacy has been violated and they were subjected to harassing calls that constitute a nuisance,” the complaint alleges.

The lawsuit asserts that AmeriSave acted negligently, willfully, or knowingly in making the calls. Each of those findings carries different potential penalties under the TCPA. Negligent violations can result in damages of up to $500 per call, while willful or knowing violations can reach the $1,500 limit.

Wilson’s complaint emphasizes that AmeriSave should have systems in place to prevent calling numbers on the Do Not Call list, including routine database updates and internal compliance protocols. The alleged failure to implement those measures forms part of the basis for the claims of willful noncompliance.

Growing Number of TCPA Lawsuits Target Unwanted Calls and Texts

The AmeriSave lawsuit adds to a growing list of cases challenging companies over unwanted telemarketing. Last year, Snapchat faced allegations that it sent promotional text messages to phone numbers registered on the Do Not Call Registry. 

The plaintiffs in that case claimed the platform used automated systems to distribute marketing content without prior consent.

Earlier this month, a California woman filed a similar lawsuit against Credit One Bank, claiming the company repeatedly called her about overdue balances even after being told to stop. 

That complaint accuses the lender of harassment and violations of federal consumer protection laws governing phone communications.

In the AmeriSave TCPA class action lawsuit, Wilson seeks to represent a nationwide class of individuals who allegedly received telemarketing calls from AmeriSave despite being listed on the Do Not Call Registry. She also proposes a subclass of Georgia residents affected by the company’s conduct.

The filing seeks statutory damages, declaratory relief, and an injunction preventing AmeriSave from continuing its current telemarketing activities. Wilson’s lawsuit argues that injunctive relief is necessary to stop future violations and protect consumers from further unsolicited calls.

Case Details

• Lawsuit: Wilson v. AmeriSave Mortgage Corporation
• Case Number: 1:25-cv-06218-ELR
• Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Plaintiffs' Attorney

• Valerie Chinn (Chinn Law Firm LLC)
• Anthony I. Paronich (Paronich Law P.C.)

Have you received unwanted sales calls from mortgage companies? Tell us about your experience below.