Case Overview: A class action lawsuit alleges Paul Mitchell misled consumers with "Made in the USA" labels, despite sourcing key ingredients for its hair care products from overseas.
Consumers Affected: Consumers in California and Illinois who purchased Paul Mitchell products labeled "Made in the USA."
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
John Paul Mitchell Systems (JPMS), the hair care giant behind popular salon-quality products, is facing a class action lawsuit accusing the company of misleading consumers with its "Made in the USA" labels.
The lawsuit alleges that despite its patriotic branding, many of JPMS’s best-selling shampoos and conditioners contain key foreign ingredients—making its claims deceptive and in violation of federal and state laws.
Illinois resident Sam Lauer and California resident Regina Brookshier, the lead plaintiffs in the lawsuit, claim they purchased JPMS products believing they were made entirely in the U.S. with domestic ingredients.
Lauer, a frequent buyer of JPMS's Tea Tree Lavender Mint Moisturizing Shampoo and several other products, says he relied on the company’s "Made in the USA" claims when purchasing from online retailers like FragranceNet.com. He later discovered that these products contained foreign-sourced ingredients, contradicting the label’s unqualified claim.
Brookshier had a similar experience when purchasing JPMS’s Tea Tree Special Shampoo from an Ulta Beauty store in California. The lawsuit states that she specifically chose the product based on its "Made in the USA" labeling but was not informed that key ingredients were sourced internationally.
JPMS, a company with estimated annual revenue exceeding $1 billion, is accused in the lawsuit of violating strict federal guidelines on "Made in the USA" labeling.
The lawsuit cites Federal Trade Commission regulations, which require that for a product to be labeled "Made in the USA" without qualification, all or virtually all of its components must be sourced and manufactured in the country.
The plaintiffs argue that JPMS knowingly misled customers by omitting any disclosure about its foreign ingredients, while competitors like Redken and Giovanni provide clear labeling about global sourcing.
The complaint claims that JPMS’s actions led consumers to overpay for products under false pretenses, thinking they were supporting American-made goods.
JPMS is just the latest in a growing list of companies being sued over questionable "Made in the USA" claims. French’s mustard is currently facing a class action lawsuit alleging that some of its products, despite being marketed as "crafted and bottled" in the U.S., contain key ingredients sourced abroad.
Similarly, major brands like Lowe’s and Reynolds have faced legal action for misrepresenting the origin of products like safety gloves and aluminum foil.
In their lawsuit, Lauer and Brookshier want to represent consumers in California and Illinois who purchased one or more of the JPMS products labeled “Made in the USA” that were made with or contained ingredients or components not grown or manufactured in the USA, within four years prior to the filing of the lawsuit.
Case Details
Plaintiffs' Attorney:
Do you use Paul Mitchell hair products? What are your thoughts on these 'Made in USA' claims? Share your opinion below.
Loading...
Injury Claims keeps you informed about lawsuits large and small that could affect your daily life. We simplify the complexities of class actions lawsuits, open class action settlements, mass torts, and individual cases to ensure you understand how these legal matters could impact your rights and interests.
If you think a recent legal case might affect you, action is required. Select a class action lawsuit or class action settlement, share your details, and connect with a qualified attorney who will explain your legal options and assist in pursuing any compensation due. Take the first step now to secure your rights.