Case Overview: A federal lawsuit filed in Florida alleges that Hatem Brothers Inc. violated the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Consumers Affected: Individuals with disabilities who may have been denied access or accommodation by Hatem Brothers Inc.

Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida

Hatem Brothers Inc. Faces Federal ADA Lawsuit in Southern District of Florida

A federal complaint filed in March 2026 alleges that Hatem Brothers Inc. violated the Americans with Disabilities Act, according to a court filing entered in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The suit, brought by plaintiff Carlos Saenz, invokes 42 U.S.C. § 12182, the provision of the ADA that prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in places of public accommodation.

What the Plaintiff Alleges

The complaint, filed on March 18, 2026, names Hatem Brothers Inc. as the defendant and asserts a civil rights claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act. The nature of the suit is classified as "Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities — Other," suggesting the alleged violation falls outside the more narrowly defined employment discrimination category under ADA Title I.

The specific accessibility barriers or accommodations at issue are not detailed in the publicly available docket text. The filing does indicate that no jury trial has been demanded, meaning the plaintiff is seeking relief from the court directly.

About the ADA and Public Accommodations

The Americans with Disabilities Act, enacted in 1990, requires businesses and other places of public accommodation to provide equal access to individuals with disabilities. Under ADA Title III — the provision cited in this lawsuit — covered entities may not discriminate against people on the basis of disability in the full and equal enjoyment of their goods, services, facilities, or accommodations.

Violations can take many forms, including physical barriers that prevent access to a facility, failure to provide effective communication for individuals with hearing or vision impairments, or inaccessible digital platforms such as websites and mobile applications. Remedies in ADA Title III cases typically include injunctive relief — court-ordered changes to bring a business into compliance — as well as attorney's fees.

The Defendant

Hatem Brothers Inc. is named as the sole defendant in the complaint. Further details about the company's nature of business or the specific location or service at issue are not available in the current public docket record.

Case Background

The lawsuit was filed by attorney Anthony Joseph Perez of the Anthony J. Perez Law Group, PLLC, a Florida-based firm. A filing fee of $405.00 was paid at the time of submission, and the summons has been issued. No response from Hatem Brothers Inc. has yet appeared in the public docket as of the filing date.

ADA accessibility litigation has remained active in the Southern District of Florida, which sees a significant volume of disability rights cases each year. Courts in that district have addressed a wide range of accessibility claims, from brick-and-mortar facility barriers to digital access issues affecting users with visual, auditory, or mobility impairments.

Lawsuit: Saenz v. Hatem Brothers Inc.

Case Number: 1:26-cv-21793

Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida

Date Filed: March 18, 2026

Plaintiff's Attorney: Anthony Joseph Perez, Anthony J. Perez Law Group, PLLC

Have you experienced accessibility barriers at a business in South Florida? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

InjuryClaims.com reports on litigation developments for informational purposes only. Nothing in this article constitutes legal advice. Eligibility for any settlement or lawsuit is determined by attorneys and courts, not by this publication.