Case Overview: A class action lawsuit alleges Dollar Tree violated federal consumer protection law by printing more credit card digits on receipts than legally permitted, potentially exposing customers to fraud risk.

Consumers Affected: Dollar Tree customers who received printed receipts displaying truncated credit card numbers with more than the legally allowed digits

Court: Not yet confirmed

Dollar Tree Class Action Alleges Federal Law Violated by Printing Too Many Credit Card Digits on Receipts

A new class action lawsuit alleges Dollar Tree has been printing too many digits of customers' credit card numbers on store receipts, a practice the complaint claims violates a federal law specifically designed to protect consumers from identity theft and financial fraud.

According to a recent report on the class action filing, the lawsuit argues Dollar Tree's receipts run afoul of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, commonly known as FACTA — a federal statute that places strict limits on how much payment card information retailers can display on printed transaction records.

Federal Law Sets Clear Limits on Receipt Information

FACTA prohibits merchants from printing more than the last five digits of a customer's credit or debit card number on any electronically generated receipt. The law also bars merchants from printing the card's expiration date. Congress enacted these protections to reduce the risk that receipts — frequently discarded, lost, or handled by multiple people — could be used to facilitate credit card fraud or identity theft.

The lawsuit alleges Dollar Tree's printed receipts include more card digits than FACTA allows, placing customers' financial information at unnecessary risk. The complaint contends this is not an isolated error but a systemic practice affecting consumers across Dollar Tree's retail locations.

What the Plaintiff Claims

According to the complaint, the plaintiff received a printed receipt from Dollar Tree that displayed a number of credit card digits exceeding the federal maximum. The lawsuit alleges this willful or negligent noncompliance with FACTA entitles affected customers to statutory damages.

Under FACTA, consumers do not need to demonstrate actual financial harm to bring a claim. The statute provides for statutory damages between $100 and $1,000 per violation for willful noncompliance, as well as attorneys' fees and costs. The lawsuit seeks to represent a class of all consumers who received similarly noncompliant receipts from Dollar Tree within the applicable statutory period.

A Widespread Retail Compliance Issue

Dollar Tree is not the first major retailer to face this type of litigation. FACTA receipt cases have been filed against a range of national chains over the years, with courts periodically certifying classes where the alleged violation is uniform across transactions. Retailers are generally required to configure their point-of-sale systems to comply with the truncation requirements — meaning the alleged violation, if proven, would likely reflect a programming or compliance oversight rather than a one-time incident.

Dollar Tree operates thousands of stores across the United States, and the proposed class could potentially include a significant number of consumers who transacted at its registers.

Dollar Tree's Response

As of publication, Dollar Tree has not issued a public statement regarding the lawsuit. The company has not yet filed a formal response to the complaint. InjuryClaims.com will update this article as the litigation develops.

Related Cases

• Valvoline Sued in Class Action Alleging Oil Changes Failed to Meet Vehicle Specifications
• Bouqs Class Action Alleges Emails Advertising Fake Discounts Sent to Washington Residents

Lawsuit: [Plaintiff Name TBD] v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.

Case Number: Not yet confirmed

Court: Not yet confirmed

Plaintiffs' Attorney(s): Not yet confirmed

Have you recently made a purchase at Dollar Tree and received a printed receipt? Share your experience in the comments below.

InjuryClaims.com reports on litigation developments for informational purposes only. Nothing in this article constitutes legal advice. Eligibility for any settlement or lawsuit is determined by attorneys and courts, not by this publication.