Case Overview | Roundup | Multiple defendants including Google, Audi, Target, Amazon, and Grubhub | Filed/Active: April 2026

5 Class Action Lawsuits Making Headlines This Week: Google, Audi, Target, Amazon, and Grubhub

From a tech giant allegedly rendering smart home devices useless to a major automaker facing claims over dangerous door locks, class action litigation has been active across multiple industries this April. Here's a look at five cases drawing attention right now.

1. Google — Nest Learning Thermostat "Bricking" Lawsuit

Status: New lawsuit filed

Who May Be Affected: Owners of first- and second-generation Nest Learning Thermostats

Alleged Harm: Loss of core product functionality

A newly filed class action lawsuit alleges that Google failed to disclose that the core functionality of its first- and second-generation Nest Learning Thermostats could be reduced or eliminated at any time — effectively "bricking" devices that consumers paid for and relied upon.

According to the complaint, Google had the ability to degrade or disable these thermostats remotely without adequately warning customers of that possibility at the time of purchase. The lawsuit claims this constitutes a failure to disclose a material fact — that the product's usefulness was never guaranteed to last.

The filing states that had purchasers known Google retained the ability to render their thermostats non-functional, they would not have bought the devices or would have paid significantly less for them.

How to follow this case: Monitor the docket for class certification updates. No settlement or claim form is available at this time.

2. Audi — Defective Door Lock Lawsuit

Status: New lawsuit filed

Who May Be Affected: Owners of certain Audi vehicle models

Alleged Harm: Door locks that can trap occupants inside or prevent entry

A new class action lawsuit alleges that certain Audi vehicles contain a door lock defect capable of locking drivers and passengers either inside or outside of the vehicle — a malfunction the complaint characterizes as both dangerous and disruptive.

According to the lawsuit, the alleged defect stems from a flaw in the door lock mechanism that can activate unexpectedly, leaving occupants unable to exit in emergency situations or unable to enter their own vehicles. The filing claims Audi was aware, or should have been aware, of this defect and failed to adequately address or disclose it to consumers.

The specific Audi models and model years covered by the proposed class have not yet been finalized by the court.

How to follow this case: No recall or settlement has been announced. Affected Audi owners may want to document any door lock issues they have experienced.

3. Target — Good & Gather Tuna "Sustainably Caught" Lawsuit

Status: New lawsuit filed

Who May Be Affected: Consumers who purchased Target's Good & Gather brand canned tuna

Alleged Harm: Misleading sustainability labeling

Target is facing a class action lawsuit that alleges the company falsely markets its Good & Gather canned tuna products as "sustainably caught," according to the complaint. The lawsuit claims the sustainability labeling on these private-label products is deceptive and misleads consumers into believing the tuna was sourced through environmentally responsible fishing practices.

The plaintiff alleges that had consumers known the true nature of how the tuna was caught, they either would not have purchased the product or would have paid less for it. This type of claim — often referred to as "greenwashing" litigation — has become increasingly common as consumers place greater value on environmental and ethical sourcing claims.

How to follow this case: No settlement or claim filing process has been established at this stage.

4. Amazon — Alexa Secret Recordings Lawsuit (Court Update)

Status: Case narrowed by federal judge

Who May Be Affected: Amazon Alexa device users whose conversations were allegedly recorded without consent

Alleged Harm: Unauthorized recording of private conversations

A Washington federal judge has significantly trimmed a class action lawsuit accusing Amazon of secretly recording Alexa users' private conversations without their knowledge or consent. While the court's ruling narrowed the scope of the case, it was not dismissed entirely, meaning a portion of the claims are proceeding.

The lawsuit alleges that Amazon's voice-activated Alexa devices recorded personal conversations beyond the intended activation commands, and that the company collected and retained this audio data without adequately disclosing the practice to users. The complaint claims this conduct violated users' privacy rights and applicable state laws.

The court's decision to trim — rather than dismiss — the case suggests some legal theories survived initial scrutiny, though the full scope of potential liability remains to be determined as the litigation continues.

How to follow this case: No settlement has been reached. The litigation is ongoing in federal court in Washington.

5. Grubhub — $24.75 Million Driver Misclassification Settlement

Status: Settlement reached

Estimated Payout: Varies; portion of $24.75 million settlement fund

Who May Be Eligible: Grubhub delivery drivers who were classified as independent contractors

Grubhub has agreed to pay $24.75 million to resolve claims that it misclassified delivery drivers as independent contractors rather than employees, according to settlement reports. The lawsuit alleged that by classifying drivers as contractors, Grubhub denied them benefits and wage protections they would have been entitled to as employees under applicable law.

This type of gig economy misclassification lawsuit has become one of the most active areas of class action litigation over the past several years, as workers for app-based delivery and ride-share platforms have sought employment status and the legal protections that come with it.

Details on who may be eligible to participate in the settlement, what proof may be required, and how to submit a claim are expected to be made available through the official settlement administration process.

How to file a claim: Visit the official settlement administrator's website once claims information is publicly posted. Eligible drivers who are members of the class may receive a portion of the settlement fund, though individual payout amounts will vary.

Key Takeaways

• Tech companies face mounting scrutiny over the lifespan and reliability of connected devices — the Google Nest lawsuit illustrates the growing legal risk of software-dependent hardware products.
• Sustainability claims are under the legal microscope — Target's Good & Gather tuna case is part of a broader trend of "greenwashing" litigation targeting environmental marketing claims.
• Gig economy settlements continue to grow — the $24.75 million Grubhub settlement reflects ongoing legal pressure on app-based platforms over worker classification.
• Privacy litigation is evolving in court — the partial survival of the Amazon Alexa case suggests courts are still working through the legal boundaries of voice data collection.
• Vehicle defect cases extend beyond safety recalls — the Audi door lock lawsuit demonstrates that consumers may have independent legal avenues even when a formal NHTSA recall has not been issued.

Are you affected by any of these cases? Share your experience in the comments below.

InjuryClaims.com reports on class action lawsuits and settlements. Nothing in this article constitutes legal advice. Only a licensed attorney can advise you on your individual legal situation.