Viewer Challenges Netflix Warner Bros Merger In Court

Case Overview: A subscriber is suing to block Netflix’s acquisition of Warner Bros Discovery, alleging it would stifle competition and raise prices.

Consumers Affected: U.S. streaming subscribers concerned about reduced competition and fewer content options.

Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Netflix’s blockbuster plan to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery’s studio and streaming businesses is already facing legal pushback. A proposed class action lawsuit filed in early December argues the $72 billion deal would reduce competition in the U.S. subscription video-on-demand market, ultimately leaving consumers with fewer choices and higher prices.

The lawsuit, brought by an HBO Max subscriber, asks a court to block the merger or impose remedies to address what it describes as anticompetitive harm, Fox reports.

It comes just days after Netflix announced the acquisition, pitching the deal as a way to expand its content library by folding in Warner Bros.’ vast film and television catalog.

Subscriber Says Netflix’s Takeover Would Gut Competition

The lawsuit was filed by Michelle Fendelander, a Las Vegas-based subscriber to HBO Max, one of Netflix’s closest competitors. She alleges that allowing Netflix to absorb Warner Bros.’ studio and streaming operations would eliminate a major rival and consolidate too much power in the hands of the world’s largest streaming service.

According to the complaint, the merger would give Netflix control over major franchises currently tied to Warner Bros., including media spanning fantasy, superheroes, and prestige television. 

The lawsuit argues that this concentration would weaken competition that currently helps keep subscription prices in check and fuels innovation across platforms. Warner Bros. Discovery is not named as a defendant in the case.

Merger Could Consolidate Streaming Power

Netflix announced the agreement on Dec. 5, saying the merger would broaden viewing options by combining its original programming with Warner Bros.’ deep library of films and TV shows, along with HBO and HBO Max content. The combined catalog would bring together legacy titles and newer hits under the Netflix umbrella.

The company has said HBO and HBO Max would continue operating as standalone services, though executives have acknowledged that different packaging options could be explored over time. Netflix has also pushed back on the lawsuit, characterizing it as an opportunistic challenge rather than a serious antitrust threat.

The deal follows a weeks-long bidding process and is already drawing scrutiny in Washington. Some members of Congress have raised concerns, and the transaction is expected to face a tough regulatory review under U.S. antitrust laws. 

Adding another wrinkle, Paramount Skydance has launched a competing bid worth more than $108 billion, which Warner Bros. Discovery’s board has said it will review.

Antitrust Spotlight Shines On Streaming Giants

U.S. antitrust law allows consumers to challenge mergers independently of government regulators, though such cases are notoriously difficult to win. Still, the lawsuit underscores growing unease around consolidation in entertainment and tech.

The law firm behind the case has pursued similar antitrust actions in the past, Reuters reports, including litigation accusing major media companies of harming competition in live-streamed television markets. As streaming giants race to scale up, the Netflix–Warner Bros. fight could become a key test of how much consolidation courts, and consumers, are willing to tolerate.

Case Details

• Lawsuit: Fendelender v. Netflix
• Case Number: 5:25-cv-10521
• Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Are you worried the Netflix Warner Bros merger could limit your choices or raise prices? Share your thoughts below.